DataSchutz Home Page
Sections
The problem

Static rule engines catch fraud after the damage is already done.

Fraud disputes create direct financial, operational and reputational pressure for financial institutions. Legacy systems built around post-event review can leave teams reacting after funds have moved.

Post-authorisation review

Fraud is found after the money moves

Rule-based engines and lookup systems flag fraud once a transaction has already been triggered — forcing banks into costly disputes and reactive investigations instead of prevention.

Regulatory exposure

The liability now sits with the bank

When suspicious activity is detected only after completion, financial institutions face investigation costs, customer remediation demands and potential financial loss.

Blind to execution threats

Modern attacks happen mid-transaction

Terminal manipulation and transaction rerouting occur while a payment is in flight. Legacy infrastructure has no visibility into the execution window — it only sees the outcome.

Trust erosion

Every incident costs a customer

Each unresolved fraud dispute compounds churn risk. Banks need a way to stop the loss before it happens, not a faster way to process the claim afterward.